The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has taken Kroger’s (NYSE: KR) $25 billion merger with Albertsons (NYSE: ACI) to court, arguing that the deal would reduce competition and lead to higher prices for consumers.

The FTC, along with several states, has expressed concerns about the merger’s impact on pricing and unionized workers’ bargaining power. Kroger and Albertsons, however, argue that the merger is essential for competing with larger retailers like Walmart and Amazon.

The trial, expected to last three weeks, will delve into the competitive dynamics of the grocery industry and determine whether the merger should proceed. In an effort to address concerns, Kroger has proposed selling 579 stores and pledging to lower prices by $1 billion post-merger. Despite these efforts, the FTC and several states continue to challenge the merger, with additional lawsuits pending in Washington and Colorado.

Allegations of Price Gouging

One notable headline emerging from the trial is “Kroger Hiked Milk, Egg Prices Above Inflation,” which has revived the argument that corporate greed significantly contributed to the recent inflationary surge.

This argument, supported by figures like former Labor Secretary Robert Reich and Senator Bernie Sanders, suggests that companies intentionally raised prices to profit from inflation. However, this perspective oversimplifies the situation and confuses cause and effect.

The Reality Behind Rising Prices

I don’t know as much about milk prices, but I closely follow major egg producer Cal-Maine Foods (NSDQ: CALM). At its core, price increases are driven by the principles of supply and demand. When demand is high, and supply is limited, prices rise to prevent shortages.

This dynamic played out in the egg market during the late 2022 and early 2023 period. A severe outbreak of bird flu led to the culling of tens of millions of egg-laying hens in the U.S., drastically reducing the supply of eggs. Supermarkets, facing this shortage, raised prices significantly to avoid running out of stock.

This scenario illustrates that price hikes, while potentially leading to higher profits, are often a response to supply constraints rather than an intentional effort to exploit consumers. In the case of eggs, prices soared well above the rate of inflation due to the supply shock, in turn contributing to overall inflation.

Understanding the Distinction Between Profit and Gouging

Critics like Robert Reich may interpret these high profits as evidence of corporate greed, but this interpretation reverses cause and effect. Similar dynamics occur in the oil industry, where rising oil prices lead to higher profits for oil companies. However, these price increases are typically a response to supply and demand imbalances rather than deliberate attempts to gouge consumers.

To illustrate the distinction between legitimate price increases and price gouging, consider two competing gas stations on the Gulf Coast before a hurricane. One station anticipates an adequate supply, while the other faces a potential shortage. If both stations significantly raise prices, an investigation would likely reveal that only the station with declining supplies acted out of necessity, while the other engaged in gouging.

Conclusions

The ongoing trial over the Kroger-Albertsons merger raises critical questions about competition, pricing, and corporate behavior in the grocery industry.

While the FTC argues that the merger could harm consumers by reducing competition, the broader debate over corporate pricing practices continues to evolve. Reduced competition is a legitimate concern, as competition is what helps keep prices in check.

Understanding the complex relationship between supply, demand, and pricing is essential for navigating these issues and making informed decisions about market dynamics and regulatory actions.

WATCH THIS VIDEO: Powell Cements Rate Cut…What it Means for YOUR Portfolio

Editor’s Note: In a new presentation, our colleague Jim Fink can show you how to receive regular payments of $2,950 or more. He calls it his “I.V.L. System” and it generates winners at an astonishing clip.

Jim Fink is the chief investment strategist of Options for Income. Every week, he’ll send you easy-to-follow instructions that’ll put you on Wall Street’s payment list. Want to earn life-changing income? Click here.