Plains All-American Bets on Light, Sweet Glut
-
74 million barrels of crude oil and refined products capacity
-
22 million barrels of NGL/LPG storage capacity
-
93 billion cubic feet of natural gas storage working capacity
-
7 fractionation plants
-
11 processing plants
-
1 isomerization unit
-
23 crude oil and NGL rail terminals
Potential Upstream/Downstream Solutions:
-
Increased usage of condensate by petrochemical companies
-
Refiners modify to accommodate more light sweet crude
-
May require commitments to lock-in crude supply at discount
-
Reduce rate of drilling to allow declines to reduce supply
-
Presidential permission to export light sweet crude
-
Shut in producing wells until wellhead price recovers
-
Increased long-haul shipments of condensate to Canada as diluent
-
Rail, barge, truck, and/or new pipelines to regions not yet out of balance
-
Absorbing some light crude by blending with heavy crudes
-
Installation of condensate splitters to qualify for export status
The partnership’s history shows a strong track record of being in the right place at the right time. PAA had its IPO on Nov. 17, 1998 at an initial market capitalization of $291 million. Today, the partnership’s market capitalization stands at $18.1 billion. In the most recent 10-year period, the average annual return of PAA units was 22.9 percent.
PAA’s $7 billion project portfolio consists of more than 200 projects. Of that total, projects worth $2.1 billion have been approved, including $1.4 billion from the 2013 capital program.The partnership has generated $7.6 billion of distributable cash flow (DCF) over the past nine years, paying out just short of three quarters of that total and reinvesting the rest. The long-term distribution coverage checks in at a prudent 134 percent.
Source: Credit Suisse MLP and Energy Logistics Conference, June 26, 2013.
The partnership expects 2013 cash flow to be 65 percent fee-based and 35 percent margin-based. Among the fee-based businesses are pipelines, storage tanks and processing plants, while margin-based assets include 800 trucks, 925 trailers and 5,400 railcars.The price of units has pulled back in recent months. In the most recent quarter, PAA’s adjusted EBITDA fell 8 percent from a year ago as competition from railroads cut into its logistics business. The Supply and Logistics segment declined 30 percent. PAA’s fee-based businesses actually grew 7 percent year-over-year.
PAA has an enterprise value of $25 billion and an Enterprise Value/EBITDA (ttm) of 10.9. Debt stands at a reasonable 3.3 times trailing Ebitda.The units presently yield 4.5 percent, and the distributions have increased in 34 of the past 36 quarters. The most recent quarter marked the 46th consecutive period in which PAA has delivered on its forecast.
At 38.5 percent of debt to assets, PAA has one of the least leveraged balance sheets among the pipeline MLPs. This minimizes the risk of rising interest rates cutting into future distributions. Given the solid project portfolio, the recent 10 percent pullback in unit price and a long-term return for unitholders that trails only Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP (NYSE: KMP) among the major midstream MLPs, PAA units are a solid store of value.(Follow Robert Rapier on Twitter, LinkedIn, or Facebook.)
Portfolio Update
Time to Punt PVR
PVR Partners (NYSE: PVR) is in many ways everything Plains All-American is not: a secondary player heavily dependent on the growth plans of its much larger unaffiliated customers, heavily leveraged as a result of recent acquisitions and thus far unable to deliver the promised results.In downgrading this portfolio holdover to a Hold after last month’s disappointing quarterly report and profit warning, we warned that a Sell recommendation would soon follow. And since the unit price continues to grind lower the time to cut and run has arrived — while PV seems overdue for a short-term bounce, it also remains vulnerable to even steeper declines.
Debt inflated to more than 6 times Ebitda will constrain long-term growth opportunities, and pinch cash flow as rates and refinancing costs rise. And soon the units issued to pay for past acquisitions will become eligible for distributions, adding to the strain on subpar coverage. Sell PVR and don’t look back.— Igor Greenwald
Stock Talk
John Roediger
Are you not making “Buy Under” recommendations anymore?
John
Investing Daily Service
We’ve discontinued providing Buy/Sell opinions on the many MLPs not in our portfolios. We think subscribers will be better off when we focus our energies on the holdings we recommend or should be recommending.
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account
Investing Daily Service
We’ve discontinued providing Buy/Sell opinions on the many MLPs not in our portfolios. We think subscribers will be better off when we focus our energies on the holdings we recommend or should be recommending.
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account
David
Fair point on no buy/sell opinions. My question on PAA, then, is whether it is a candidate for the Conservative portfolio?
Igor Greenwald
Given the quality of the assets and the management, it will always be a candidate. But obviously not in it at the moment. Better opportunities elsewhere right now, for my money.
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account
Philip Mcnamee
With such a rave article about PAA, certainly you folks could agree on a reasonable “buy under” price. What is it?
Igor Greenwald
We don’t have a buy-below price because we’re not recommending PAA at the moment. The point of the article was that it’s a solid partnership for the long-haul. Not sure how a target below the current price would be helpful.
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account
Add New Comments
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account