Kinder Merger: When Less Is Much More
It’s a theme we’ve been harping on for the last year here: investors in master limited partnerships are frequently at risk from conflicts of interest.
For captains of the industry, MLP investors — also known as limited partners — are less true partners than a convenient source of capital. Once the convenience wears off…well, it’s a jungle out there, and the last place you want to be is between the apex predator and his next meal.
Because if you do end up there, the partnership agreement won’t save you and neither will a board of directors that’s really there to do the bidding of the MLP sponsor.
The only solution is to own, if possible, the securities in which the decision-makers are invested most heavily. Because there hasn’t yet been an MLP deal unfair to insiders.
At MLP Profits, we’ve applied this reasoning most enthusiastically to Kinder Morgan (NYSE: KMI), naming it a Best Buy in July for the rich incentives KMI reaped from its MLP affiliate Kinder Morgan Energy Partners (NYSE: KMP). Importantly, KMI is where founder and CEO Rich Kinder has invested the bulk of his billions.
Then, late Sunday, came the news that KMI would buy out KMP, as well as KMP proxy Kinder Morgan Management (NYSE: KMR) and another affiliated MLP, El Paso Pipeline Partners (NYSE: EPB), at a premium.
True, the Kinder offer was mostly KMI stock sweetened with a modest dollop of cash. Still, the gains for all the Kinder investors Monday were undeniable, as was the fact that the limited partners in KMP, KMR and KMI saw more of them than KMI shareholders.
Perhaps Rich Kinder has gone soft and forgot where his own bread was buttered. I kid, of course. In fact, while Kinder limited partners have had a good week, Rich Kinder has positioned himself (and, unavoidably, other KMI shareholders) for a much better decade. A lot of long-term value has been shifted to KMI from the partnerships it’s buying out.
Impetus for the deal came from the fact that KMP was already turning over nearly half its cash flow to KMI, which had two undesirable consequences. First, it required KMP to earn a return of at least 14% on an investment just to cover KMI’s take and its own nearly 7% yield. Also, as a result of heavy equity issuance to finance new investments, per-unit distribution growth at KMP had slowed, turning off enough investors to push up the yield and thereby make its equity financing that much costlier.
The merger announced last week attacks this problem from two directions. First (at least this is the part that Kinder was keen to stress) it takes advantage of the assets on the books of the affiliated MLPs and the stepped up basis made possible by the buyout to claim for the new KMI $20 billion in tax savings from depreciation over the next 14 years.
Under the current setup, most of this basis would have been available to KMP and EPB limited partners to defer taxes on their distributions. Now the benefits will accrue to KMI, serving to dramatically lower its income tax bill.
Using a 6% discount rate (well above what it will cost the merged company to borrow money in the near term) the net present value of these tax savings is somewhere north of $13 billion. A bit more than $7 billion of that is staying with the limited partners of KMP, KMR and EPB, since they will own 55% of the merged company and will benefit from its ability to pay lower income taxes. But the other $6 billion is going to benefit the KMI shareholders prior to the merger. And though some of that will be courtesy of the stepped up basis created in the merger, a lot will come from the MLPs and their limited partners.
Let’s just estimate the present value of the tax savings transferred from the MLP limited partners to current KMI shareholders at more than $4 billion. As it happens, $4 billion is what KMI has offered for its MLPs in cash. It’s also paying $40 billion in stock and assuming debt of another $27 billion, but the point is that the cash cost likely doesn’t even cover the present value of the transferred tax savings.
And it most certainly doesn’t cover the other major benefit of this deal to KMI, which is the serious reduction in the aggregate equity income paid by the Kinder Morgan corporate family as a result of replacing MLP LP units yielding nearly 7% with KMI shares yielding 4.3% currently.
The savings are impressive. KMP, KMR and EPB declared aggregate distributions of $795 million in the most recent quarter. If those units were immediately replaced with KMI shares at the exchange ratios stipulated by the merger, their owners would have been paid $548 million based on the current KMI dividend. That’s a savings of $247 million a quarter, or roughly $1 billion a year.
After the 15% dividend increase KMI has promised for next year it would still end up paying the former limited partners $637 million per quarter, or $158 million less than it will send them this month. In fact, the savings are so large that if KMI merely opted to pay its expanded shareholder base next year as much as the entire MLP family will pay shareholders and limited partners this year, it would need to raise its 2015 dividend by 25% rather than the promised 15%.
Now let’s look at the long-term cumulative effect of the reduced payouts for KMP and KMR unitholders only. To do that, I’ve assumed that KMP could have continued increasing its distributions by 5% annually, as it’s doing this year, and compared those to the KMI dividends KMP limited partners stand to collect under the stipulated unit exchange ratio and the merged KMI’s projected dividend growth rate (15% in 2015 and 10% annually thereafter.) The last column simply multiplies the per-unit shortfall by the 461.7 million KMP and KMR shares currently outstanding and keeps a running total of the cumulative savings likely to be realized by KMI over these years.
Now, Kinder Morgan has a similar table in its merger presentation, only it adjusts the hypothetical KMP payout to factor in the $10.77 per KMP unit it has offered in cash.
But we’ve already established that the cash portion doesn’t fully compensate for the tax benefits transferred in the merger, much less the yield shortfall. Nor will the cash payout be enough to cover the tax bill KMP limited partners will face as a result of the combination. Kinder Morgan estimates the average tax bill of its LPs at $12.39 per unit at the Aug. 8 KMI share price of $36.12 and at $16.41 should the share price rice to $44.44 by the deal close expected late this year.
These are tax bills the limited partners could have continued to defer without the buyout, and would have dodged entirely had they passed on the units to their heirs. And while these tax benefits weren’t listed on KMP’s balance sheet, they are certainly central to the value proposition of any MLP. Now they’re gone. Rich Kinder doesn’t care about your tax bill. He’s hungry.
The insight driving this deal is that investors have been valuing rapid and predictable dividend growth much more highly than a high absolute yield. So instead of an aggregate yield of maybe 6% growing at 6% a year for its affiliates now, the new Kinder Morgan will offer 4.5% growing at 10% annually. And this in turn means the company will save $2.8 billion on reduced payouts over the next seven years, for a net present value of $2.4 billion. Add in similar savings on EPB distributions and net present value tops $3 billion.
Note that these savings are exclusively at the expense of the KMP, KMR and EPB limited partners at the time of the merger. The corresponding benefit will accrue to current KMI shareholders, who not only won’t see their payout cut but will in fact receive higher and more secure KMI dividends as a result of the reduction in the payouts to their merger partners.
The updated merger value exchange scoreboard looks like this:
The thing about 2022 is, it’s a long way off and any benefits that don’t start to accrue until then are highly uncertain. But the big tax bill and payout reductions will be felt as soon as the deal closes.
In contrast, current KMI shareholders appear to be paying $4 billion cash for tangible benefits with a net present value of at least $7 billion, and probably meaningfully more than that. Have I mentioned yet that Rich Kinder owns 23% of KMI but only 0.14% of KMP and KMR?
So, to sum up, Kinder Morgan’s proposed buyout of its affiliated master limited partnerships provides a number of cheaply purchased advantages for current shareholders. It will lead to faster, more secure dividend growth based on tax offsets and distribution savings secured at the expense of the limited partners in those MLP affiliates.
The added financial flexibility will allow the company to promote a faster dividend growth rate to investors and give it the means to continue investing in costly but potentially lucrative new projects.
Last week’s market action reflected the prevailing view that this was a deal without losers, other than the taxman. KMI shares jumped 15%, and the price of the MLP affiliates increased even more, incorporating, in addition to KMI’s rise, much of the modest acquisition premium on offer.
In recognition of the value transferred, we’re raising the buy limit on KMI to $45. Below that level, shares should provide good value over the medium term.
But given the gains since the merger news we’re also removing KMI from our Best Buys list. And if the stock should hit out new target in the near term we’ll likely be advising readers to take profits.
Why? Because the merger will more than double KMI’s share count, and put 55% of the float in the hands of the former MLP limited partners. Inertia will ensure that a lot of those newly issued shares will stay put. But some will need to be sold to pay many of those partners’ big tax bills, and more will hit the market as investors opt to invest in other MLPs rather than accept the reduced, taxable yield Kinder Morgan will be offering them.
That’s not a pressing concern now in the afterglow of the deal but will loom larger later this year as the merger closing approaches. The bottom line is that KMI shares will exhibit heightened volatility relative to the midstream sector at least through the year’s end, and will be on a short leash here accordingly.
Stock Talk
Tom Light
Igor- Great article!
Thank you for your analysis on this -it helps . Could you give us an idea what you think a sell price might be for
KMP prior to the buy out-or does the $ 10.00/unit sound good enough to hold on.
We own an equal number of shares/units in both KMP and KMI and the size has grown to large in proportion to
the total portfolio-trying to decide whether to sell KMP or KMR or maybe 1/2 in each-any suggestions will be appreciated.
Tom
Igor Greenwald
Thanks for the kind words. It’s generally not a bad idea to lighten up into a merger pop on a portfolio holding that’s become too large relative to the rest. At this point KMP and KMI are effectively tethered by the exchange offer, and its $10 cash component is incorporated into the current price of KMP. A couple of reasons to lighten up on KMI first would be that 1) KMI gains would be taxed at the favorable long-term capital gains rate entirely, versus the depreciation recapture portion of KMP’s that’s taxable at your personal income tax rate, and 2) as David noted yesterday, Kinder Morgan could easily delay the KMP tax hit for limited partners by closing the merger after the end of 2014, though I don’t know whether it would do that.
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account
David
To add to Tom’s question below, any thoughts about how to analyze the tax situation? I started buying KMP units more than 10 years ago. So I’m assuming that I have some units with a pretty low tax basis and for which I’ll have a big hit. How do I analyze the tax situation and figure out whether to sell before the transaction closes?
Also, is it to KMI’s best interest to close this deal this year? If not a big deal to KMI, it would seem to me that the company could help out the KMP holders by closing the deal after December 31, thus delaying the tax hit for 15 months.
Igor Greenwald
The tax reprieve Kinder could provide by closing the merger in 2015 is an excellent idea and an angle I hadn’t thought of, and would be the only one that would make selling now less advantageous than holding on until the closing. Otherwise, the tax consequences should be the same. Of course, I have no idea whether the company would do that; it did say in its presentation of the deal that the transaction is expected to close in Q4, and I think we have to take it at its word. As for figuring out the tax hit, you might want to look at your prior K-1’s. The difference between the sale price and your original cost basis on any units would be taxed at the long-term capital gains rate. The difference between your original cost basis and current cost basis based on past returns of capital is subject to depreciation recapture and taxable at the personal income tax rate, though you can offset that somewhat by utilizing the partnership’s passive losses. For a little more on this subject, please check out these links:
http://blogs.wsj.com/totalreturn/2014/08/12/qa-how-the-kinder-morgan-deal-affects-investors-taxes/
Jim Fink
As Igor notes, there is a direct conflict of interest between KMI and KMP regarding taxes. The deal transfers the deferred tax benefit from MLP unit holders to Kinder Morgan Inc. Delaying the closing would enable MLP unit holders to delay the tax hit but would also delay KMI from the tax benefit of an increased depreciation deduction.
Since Richard Kinder’s net worth is almost entirely in KMI and not the MLPs, I seriously doubt that he would delay the closing until 2015 in order to help the MLP unitholders at the expense of KMI shareholders.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/unraveling-the-tax-bill-of-the-kinder-morgan-deal-1407970549
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account
Add New Comments
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account