Searching for a Bottom
About two years ago, I outlined my expectations for oil prices over the next few years. I reiterated those expectations in an article here at Investing Daily in mid-summer 2013. I wrote that I thought “oil is likely to trade in a range — perhaps as low as $70 up to maybe $120 for the next few years.”
That may seem like an awfully wide range, but over the past year we have flirted with both ends of it. In June the price of West Texas Intermediate was hovering near $110 a barrel (bbl), while Brent exceeded $115/bbl. On the low end, this past week the price of WTI closed in the upper $70’s/bbl, while Brent fell to the lower $80’s.
The history of the oil industry is one of cycles. Prices fluctuate according to the dynamics of supply and demand. When there is a large differential between available oil and demand for that oil, there is downward pressure on prices. The extent of the pressure is related to the extent of the gap between demand and supply.
Several years ago I created a graphic to show what was happening with oil supply and demand and how that was affecting prices.
What the graph illustrates is that at the beginning of the last decade, the available oil production capacity around the world was comfortably ahead of global demand. But the price of oil at that time was low, and when prices are low oil companies invest less money in new oil exploration and production.
You have probably heard the saying “The cure for high prices is high prices.” Well, the inverse of that is true as well. When oil prices are low, demand growth is more robust but investment in new capacity lags. This happened over the first half of the previous decade, and so what had been perhaps 5 million barrels per day (bpd) of spare capacity in 2000 had shrunk to maybe 2 million bpd by 2005 as robust demand growth eroded the world’s oil supply cushion.
The rest is history. Not only did this diminishing supply cushion cause the price of oil to rise, but it greatly increased the price volatility. This is because when you have 5 million bpd of spare capacity, loss of 1 or 2 million bpd because of unrest in an oil producing country won’t upset the market all that much because there are still plenty of other suppliers to fill the void. Decrease that supply cushion to 2 million bpd and traders get very nervous when supplies are lost from major oil producing countries like Libya or Nigeria.
But then when the price of oil rises, oil companies spend a lot of money to explore for and produce oil. The higher the price, the greater the spending. High oil prices made shale oil production economical for the first time, but then the resulting shale oil boom led to production growth outstripping demand growth.
To put the shale rush into perspective, over the past five years global oil production has increased by 3.85 million bpd. But U.S. production increased by 3.22 million bpd over that time span after falling with nary an interruption for nearly 40 years. Thus, the recent U.S. oil boom — spurred on by higher oil prices — is responsible for 83.6% of the total global oil production increase.
So higher prices did what higher prices do — increased investment and boosted oil production (there was a three-year lag between the first oil price spikes of 2004-5 and production growth given the time required to complete a project). But high prices also curbed demand growth, and once more the world began to see its supply cushion expanding. It has taken a bit longer than I expected, but oil prices have finally softened in response.
How far might they fall? In the short term, prices can overcorrect in either direction. Could crude drop to $50/bbl? It could temporarily (although I don’t think it’s likely), but it wouldn’t stay there long. Already companies are announcing reductions in capital expenditures for 2015, and thus begins the first step in setting up the next rise in the price of oil.
Why did I set $70/bbl as the lower limit of the trading range? Because the marginal cost of shale oil is probably around $80/bbl. New spending will slow at that level (as we are already seeing), and that will slow future supply growth, while demand growth is likely to pick up in response to lower prices.
A recent Bloomberg story noted that there is still plenty of money to be made for oil companies at $80/bbl oil, but there are also plays that will be uneconomical to produce above that level. Deepwater exploration can be even costlier and more price-sensitive than shale drilling. Thus, the further oil prices fall, the more capital spending will be cut and the slower future supplies will grow.
Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance
On the other hand, as the graphic above shows, some shale plays have breakeven costs as low as $50/bbl. So there is still plenty of money to be made even at the lower end of my expected range. It largely depends on a given company’s leaseholds.
But what do I think will happen when we break out of that trading range? The same thing that happened after we broke out of the previous range. We will produce all of the easiest shale plays, and prices will rise as those supplies deplete. (On the flip side, the costs of exploiting existing plays are falling as producers climb the shale oil learning curve.)
Just as we have already seen “peak $20/bbl oil,” we will see “peak $70/bbl oil” and then we will see oil prices break to the upside and establish a new range well above the current price. When might that happen? Stay tuned.
Conclusions
Investing in oil and gas producers is all about understanding the cycle and picking your entry points. I still believe that a $70-$120/bbl range for oil over the next few years is likely to hold. As oil rises above $85/bbl I become more conservative in my buys, and the further we fall below $85/bbl the more aggressive I become. Given the current WTI price of ~$78/bbl, I think we are near a bottom. I don’t see a lot of downside from this point. As a result, I think a number of oil producers are looking pretty attractive.
(Follow Robert Rapier on Twitter, LinkedIn, or Facebook.)
Portfolio Update
Hamm: Single, Unhedged and Unafraid
Our view that oil is near the end of its slide received an important endorsement last week from none other than Harold Hamm, the irrepressible founder, chairman and CEO of Continental Resources (NYSE: CLR), which remains a big winner for our Aggressive Portfolio.
Hamm is the richest oilman in the US at #24 on the Forbes 400 list and is justifiably viewed as the canniest shale developer. While leading Continental to another huge annual production gain (29% year-over-year in Q3) Hamm also unloaded all of the company’s oil hedges for this year and 2015-16.
“We view the recent downdraft in oil prices as unsustainable given the lack of fundamental change in supply and demand,” Hamm said in a statement. On the quarterly conference call, he followed up with the prediction that crude would bounce back to the “mid 80s lower 90s range over the short term.”
Hamm’s not complacent about the longer-term implications of recent production gains outpacing the growth in demand. Continental has cut its planned $5 billion capital spending budget for next year by $600 million, and reduced its 2015 output forecast to an increase of 23% to 29% as a result. A slower exploration pace will allow demand to catch up and let the company continue to whittle down its production costs, Hamm noted.
One place Continental isn’t slowing down is in its new Springer Shale discovery in its Oklahoma backyard, where highly predictable early wells are delivering first-year returns above 80% with crude at $80.
In short, neither the company’s performance not oil market fundamentals justify the stock’s 32% plunge from its record high at the end of August, notwithstanding the ensuing swings between two sentiment extremes and in the price of crude.
An Oklahoma court removed another overhang this week by ordering Hamm to pay approximately $1 billion over a period of eight years in his divorce case, which should not force him to sell much, if any, of his 68% stake in Continental
After recommending taking partial profits back in April with the share price at $68, we feel very comfortable wading back in and resuming a full position here. Continental remains a fast-growing producer with some of the best shale acreage, strong leadership and an investment-grade credit rating, and it’s now strongly leveraged to a crude rebound we believe is coming. Buy CLR below $70. In addition, given Continental’s scale and financial strength we’re shifting it to the Growth portfolio.
— Igor Greenwald
Stock Talk
Add New Comments
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account