High Income From Grim Reaper

The overwhelming majority of master limited partnerships are involved with fossil fuels, and it has of course been a very bad 12 months for energy commodities, and in turn for most MLPs. But there is a fair number of MLPs outside of the fossil fuel space. Today I want to introduce one of these unconventional partnerships.

Early in my investing career, I made what ultimately turned out to be a very good long-term decision. I figured that as the Baby Boomers grew older, they would likely spur a boom in the pharmaceutical industry. Of course I wasn’t the first person to figure this out, but I did invest on the basis of that hypothesis.

I have had money invested in healthcare mutual funds for more than two decades, and even though I put my first dollars in just before an early biotech bubble burst in the late 1980s, the decision to invest long-term in healthcare funds was perhaps the best of my investing career.

About a decade after my first healthcare investments, I was telling a friend about my rationale for investing in the sector. He paused for a moment, and then said “I guess in 20 years you may want to think about moving some of that money into funeral homes.” My first thought was “My gosh that’s morbid,” but then I decided that maybe he had a point.

There were a total of about 76 million births in the U.S. from 1946 to 1964, the period usually called the “baby boom.” At present, about 99% of those Baby Boomers are still alive, but those numbers are projected to steadily decline over the next few decades.


150902MLPIIdemographics
Of course this means more business for the funeral industry. Not only does this mean more funerals, but it means more pre-sales to the Baby Boomers who plan ahead. While there are a number of trends affecting the industry besides the increase in the number of people dying each year (e.g., the number of people opting for lower cost cremations over funerals is steadily increasing), there is a way for MLP investors to invest in the space.

StoneMor Partners (NYSE: STON) is an owner and operator of cemeteries. As of Aug. 30, the partnership owned and operated 304 cemeteries and 102 funeral homes in 28 states and Puerto Rico. It is the only operator in this space organized as an MLP. Unlisted StoneMor GP LLC serves as the general partner of StoneMor Partners. StoneMor was founded in 1999 and is headquartered in Pennsylvania.

StoneMor divides its business into regional Cemetery Operations and Funeral Homes segments. The cemetery products and services include burial lots, lawn crypts, mausoleum crypts, cremation niches, and perpetual care rights; burial vaults, caskets, grave markers and grave marker bases, and memorials; and installation services for burial vaults, caskets, and other cemetery merchandise. StoneMor also provides receptacles for cremated remains and funeral home services, such as consultation, the removal and preparation of remains, and the use of funeral home facilities for visitation and prayer services.

StoneMor debuted as a publicly traded partnership in 2004 with 132 cemeteries and 7 funeral homes, and an Enterprise Value (EV) of $233 million. 2004 revenue was $89 million and operating profit was $29 million. Today, StoneMor has an EV of $1.2 billion, and for the most recent 12 months had revenue of $386 million and operating profit of $66.7 million.

For the quarter that ended June 30, revenue reached a record $80.8 million, a 13% increase from a year earlier. Production-based revenue during the quarter reached $107.0 million, an increase of 23% in a year’s time. Adjusted operating profit was $20.2 million, up 42% from the same period last year.

Distributable free cash flow for the most recent quarter increased to $19.2 million from $15.4 million in the prior year period. The increase was driven primarily by higher pre-need sales, which generated increased inflows to the merchandise trust fund.

StoneMor has been aggressive at making acquisitions since its IPO. It employs a disciplined acquisition strategy with specific target criteria for cemeteries and funeral homes. The company targets acquisition with multiples of 4x – 6x EBITDA.

Over the past year, as oil and gas prices plummeted, StoneMor units trounced the Alerian MLP Index (AMZ). StoneMor was also well ahead of the S&P 500 for most of the past year. Despite a steep correction that began in late July, StoneMor shares have still outperformed the S&P 500 over the past 12 months.

150902MLPIIstonshareprice
The same pattern holds over the past decade. StoneMor’s average annual total return outpaced the NASDAQ 100, and handily outpaced the AMZ and the S&P 500.

150902MLPIIstonperf10yr

Following the most recent quarter, StoneMor increased the quarterly distribution by $0.01 per unit to $0.65/unit, or $2.60 on an annualized basis. StoneMor has increased the annual distribution every year since its IPO, and the latest payout translates to an annualized yield of 9.5%.

Most investors in the MLP space are looking for tax-advantaged income. Nearly by default, that means they are investing in the fossil fuel space, since that income just happens to generally derive from producing, transporting, processing, and distributing fossil fuels. But StoneMor Partners provides a good example of an MLP that is outside of the conventional MLP space. Those MLPs still provide tax-advantaged income, but have been largely untouched by the carnage taking place in the broader oil and gas markets.

(Follow Robert Rapier on Twitter, LinkedIn, or Facebook.)

Stock Talk

Henry Turner

Henry Turner

Look up the increasing number of people who choose to be cremated rather than have their bodies buried, particularly in the fastest growing states, and states with a greater number of young people. Cremated bodies don’t need burial plots. That’s a trend that will not be good for Stonemor.

Igor Greenwald

Igor Greenwald

The cash flow trends are also not favorable, as I’ve just noted in response to another comment.

Robert Zeller

Robert Zeller

In the past 2 years, STON has had only 1 quarter of positive earnings per share. Yet sales as you have noted go up every year. Are they making acquisitions by issuing more stock thus keeping the earnings per share in negative territory?
Debt is 141% of its market value. It looks like they are using a lot of leverage. Even though the dividend is high, is their debt risky? I know that REITs that are growing will do this but it makes me uneasy to have more debt than is secured by assets.

Igor Greenwald

Igor Greenwald

Just to be clear, we’re not recommending STON, nor have we added it ti any of the MLP Profits portfolios. It’s pretty clear to me upon some further research that operating cash flow is nowhere near sufficient to cover the distribution after accounting for debt service, so that the payouts are financed with additional debt at this point. If you’re overly impressed by the units’ recovery in the last month, just wait for the next short-seller hit article, buy when the price falls the low 20s again, and then hope it recovers once more. But I wouldn’t.

Robert Zeller

Robert Zeller

Thanks, Igor.
I’m glad you are looking at MLPs outside of the energy area.

The 10 year total return graphs in green for STON looked impressive but I’m glad your further analysis and commentary raised the caution flag even higher than my superficial fact finding.

I’m sure you will let us know if this company gets its finances in better shape.

Mr. Ed, The Talking Horse

Mr. Ed, The Talking Horse

Guys, maybe I’m stating the obvious but not sure how useful it is to do a feature article on an MLP that you don’t necessarily recommend, especially with the title “High Income…” as it suggests that it is something we should look at.

One area that I would like is updated analysis on the tanker market, both for products and crude, and identify areas of overlap and differentiation between the mlps you do recommend. For example, how is DHT different from Euronav, or if fact are they so similar that we should be looking at price differentiation only between the two, etc, etc.

Igor Greenwald

Igor Greenwald

The top of the weekly MLP Investing Insider dispatch goes out to a wider audience than subscribers, and focuses on non-portfolio securities by design. I think subscribers too, though, can get some value out of an introduction to a wider range of businesses than are included in our portfolios at any given time. That said, the weekly dispatches also typically include an update on a specific portfolio recommendation at the bottom. On EURN vs. DHT, EURN is larger and is committed to returning more of its income via dividends (80% vs 60% for DHT.) On the other hand, DHT is a little cheaper. I like them as a combined play on rising tanker rates; that approach also helps to spread the risk a bit.

Add New Comments

You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account