A Worthy Trust

SandRidge Mississippian Trust I (NYSE: SDT) went public in April 2011 and owns royalty interests in 37 horizontal wells producing oil and natural gas from the Mississippian formation in Oklahoma and a stake in 123 additional horizontal wells to be drilled over the next few years by the grantor, SandRidge Energy (NYSE: SD). All of these wells are located on a 64,200 acre “area of mutual interest” (AMI) in Oklahoma’s Alfalfa, Garfield, Grant, Major and Woods counties.

Here’s how the royalty structure breaks down.

1. The trust is entitled to receive 90 percent of all proceeds from the sale of oil and natural gas associated with the existing 37 producing horizontal plays after deducting post-production costs and taxes. The remaining 10 percent is paid to SandRidge Energy.

2. The trust is entitled to receive 50 percent of the proceeds from the 123 wells scheduled to be drilled over the next few years, with the balance paid to SandRidge Energy.

Note that SandRidge Energy doesn’t own a 100 percent interest in all the wells covered by the trust. In these cases, trust’s share of a particular well’s proceeds will be adjusted according to its stake in the particular well.

SandRidge Energy is required under the terms of the trust to drill the 123 additional wells on the AMI properties by Dec. 31, 2014, though that deadline can be extended by one additional year under certain circumstances.

A horizontal well’s productivity depends in part of the length of the well’s laterals, or the horizontal segment that intersects the oil and natural gas reservoir. The terms of the trust stipulate that only wells with a perforated lateral segment–the portion of the well that produces oil and gas–of at least 2,500 feet will count toward the 123 wells. In addition, SandRidge must have at least a 57 percent working interest in each well.

The trust structure also includes offsets to these requirements. For example, SandRidge Energy could reduce the number of wells it must sink by drilling longer laterals and focusing on projects in which it has a higher ownership stake.

Note that the trust itself isn’t responsible for the costs associated with drilling these 123 new horizontal wells, limiting trustholders’ exposure to the rising cost of hydraulic fracturing and other critical production services.

However, the trust is liable for its share of the post-production costs, including gathering and processing fees. Administration expenses associated with running the trust also reduce trustholders cash receipts. In general, post-production and administration costs are significantly lower and far more predictable than operating and drilling costs.

This trust stands out because of two other risk-reducing features.

At the time of its initial public offering, the trust had hedged roughly 54 percent of its planned production and 60 percent of its estimated revenue between April 1, 2011, and Dec. 31, 2015. Management expects the trust’s output to be split evenly between oil and natural gas. The trust has hedged about 40 percent of its gas production and around 70 percent of planned oil output through 2015.

These hedges offer significant near-term protection from fluctuations in commodity prices, while offering exposure to oil and gas prices after 2015–a potential upside catalyst.

Although we expect oil prices to remain elevated over coming years because of rapidly increasing global demand and constraints on supply growth, our intermediate- and long-term outlook for US natural gas prices remains sanguine. This stance might come as a surprise to readers, as we remain bearish on domestic gas prices in the near term.

But the coming years will be kind to natural gas. With rising concern about carbon dioxide emissions, US utilities are increasingly turning to natural gas-fired power plants to boost baseload capacity. Meanwhile, nuclear reactors take far too long to build, while alternatives only generate power intermittently and can’t add baseload power to the grid.

The nation’s vast gas shale reserves also make it difficult to envision a world in which domestic demand for natural gas doesn’t improve over the long term.

In short, the trust’s structure ensures a reliable income stream in the early years and the potential for additional upside after 2015. We also like that SandRidge Energy has retained ownership of 3.75 million shares in the trust, equivalent to a 17.8 percent stake. The parent company will receive the same distributions as individual holders.

In addition, SandRidge Energy owns 7 million subordinated shares that will pay out a regular distribution only if the trust generates sufficient cash flow to disburse at least 80 percent of the targeted quarterly distribution. If quarterly cash flow falls short of this threshold, the subordinate shares will forego part or all of their contingent distribution, until common shareholders are made whole.

These 7 million subordinate shares account for 25 percent of outstanding shares (21 million common shares and 7 million subordinated shares), providing a substantial cushion against shortages in cash flow.

However, SandRidge Energy does receive a carrot for providing this cushion. When distributions exceed 120 percent of their targeted quarterly amounts, the subordinated shares entitle SandRidge Energy to a 50 percent bonus on all amounts over this threshold. The subordinated units will convert into common units four calendar years from the date that SandRidge Energy completes its obligation to drill those 123 wells.

Although these subordinated units limit potential upside when quarterly distributions are high, the downside protection that this structure provides in lean times is a welcome offset. In addition, the size of SandRidge Energy’s bonus should incentivize the company to exceed the 120 percent distribution threshold as often as possible by accelerating drilling activity.

Let’s look at the trust’s targeted quarterly distributions.


Source: SandRidge Mississippian Trust I Form S-1/A Registration Statement

This graph tracks the targeted quarterly distributions for the SandRidge Mississippi Trust I through to the final quarter of 2016. The upper line represents the 120 percent threshold; the lower line represents the 80 percent payout threshold.

Note that the trust’s registration statement calls for the distribution to rise through the end of 2014 and decline thereafter. That’s because the terms of the trust require SandRidge Energy to drill these 123 new wells by 2014; production should increase as new wells come onstream, boosting the payout. Once new drilling ceases, oil and gas output will begin to decline until the trust expires in 2030, at which point it well sell its remaining assets and distribute the proceeds.

The potential upside comes from better-than-expected drilling results and/or higher-than-expected commodity prices.

Since the initial public offering in April, SandRidge Mississippi Trust has paid out one distribution–$1.068461 per unit, disbursed on Aug. 30, 2011. This amount is above the scheduled target distribution, but a bit shy of that 120 percent threshold. Based on this early performance, the trust appears on track to meet or exceed the targeted levels.

Assuming the trust manages to pay out according to its scheduled target over the next year, the common shares yield roughly 12 percent. The equivalent 80 percent and 120 percent payout thresholds would result in yields of 9.5 and more than 14 percent, respectively.

In addition to the incentives associated with the subordinated shares, SandRidge Energy plans to spin off other assets as a means of funding its drilling programs. If this initial foray generates solid returns for investors, the company should have little trouble raising capital via a similar trust.

For these reasons, we expect the trust’s distributions to meet or exceed 120 percent threshold more often than not. The potential returns in this scenario are impressive. Between now and 2016, the trust could disburse between $16 and $19 in distributions per unit. Elevated oil prices and rapid distribution growth could also drive up the price of the common shares. Energy trusts and MLPs often post their best returns in their first few years of public trading because rising distributions tend to drive capital appreciation.

SandRidge Energy’s production estimates for the 123 wells it will drill in the Mississippian appear reasonable. This play has been in production for decades, so the geology is well-known. Previous activity in this formation focused on vertical wells, but horizontal wells have given the play a new lease on life.

Although not enough horizontal wells have been drilled in the region to produce reliable production and decline curves, SandRidge Energy is an experienced operator and thus far drilling activity has yielded consistent results. SandRidge Energy may have low-balled the trust’s production potential slightly to generate above-average distribution growth,

The stock has pulled back from its early August high amid volatility in the broader market and shouldn’t drop below $19 to $22, assuming a barrel of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil doesn’t tumble into the low $70s. When WTI claws its way back to $90 per barrel, the stock could rebound into the high $20s.

SandRidge Mississippian Trust I is a more aggressive income play than Linn Energy, which boasts a more robust hedge book and continues to grow through acquisitions. But the significantly higher yield offered by the trust offsets these risks.

Note that SandRidge Mississippian Trust is taxed as an MLP, so you will receive a K-1 form at tax time. Part of your income will be considered a return of capital and will not be taxable until you sell the trust. The rest will be considered ordinary income and taxed at your marginal income tax rate. For more details, on the K-1 forms and the tax treatment of MLP-like structures, check out MLPs and Taxation: A Quick Refresher from Tax Season

A high-yield play on a rebound in WTI prices SandRidge Mississippian Trust I rates a buy up to 24 in the Wildcatters Portfolio.

booked a roughly 43 percent gain on half our short position in the Sept. 21, 2011, issue. Investors shouldn’t allocate any new money to the short sale of First Solar. We will issue a Flash Alert in coming weeks to cash out our remaining position. Instead, consider our short positions in Diamond Offshore and First Trust ISE Revere Natural Gas.
Although the risk of the US slipping into recession remains elevated, our proprietary Recession Radar indicates that a prolonged period of relatively slow growth remains the most likely outcome at this point.
In fact, recent data suggest the US economy has stabilized. Earlier this week, the Manufacturing Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) ticked up to 51.6 in September–an increase of 1 percentage point from the August reading. Monthly PMI numbers greater than 50 indicate that economic activity in the manufacturing expanded.
Automobile also sales surged to more than 13 million annualized units in September, while data from ADP Employer Services indicate that the US created 91,000 jobs last month–almost 20,000 more payroll additions than the consensus estimate.
In April and May, the stock market began to swoon when US economic data consistently fell short of expectations. A slew of better-than-expected economic data could support a year-end rally in US equities.
The EU’s ongoing sovereign-debt crisis remains a wildcard. Policymakers have moved slowly to address the problems in Greece, Italy and Spain, reminding voters of the downside of fiscal integration. Despite the popular outcry against bailouts, policymakers understand that an Italian or Spanish government default would devastate the global economy, strain the EU financial system and potentially touch off a global credit crunch.
Recent news flow suggests that the EU may announce a coordinated plan to recapitalize the region’s embattled banks and support fiscally weak national governments before the G-20 meets in early April.
In the near term, expect the uncertainty to roil equity markets and cap an upside. We continue to recommend a three-pronged investment strategy:
1.    Buy high-yield safe havens. Our top picks include master limited partnerships (MLP) and dividend-paying stocks such as SeaDrill (NYSE: SDRL). In this issue, I also take a look at US royalty trusts, as well as some high-yield bonds and preferred shares issued by US independents.
2.    Buy cheap growth. The recent selloff of cyclical energy names reflects the growth scare that began earlier this summer and intensified amid signs of an economic slowdown in the developed world and fear that the EU sovereign-debt crisis would yield a global credit crunch. In many instances, this downdraft doesn’t reflect industry fundamentals.

The previous issue of The Energy Strategist, /energy-strategist/articles/4622/raked-over-the-coals highlighted the discrepancy between the Peabody Energy Corp’s (NYSE: BTU) stock price and the tight supply-demand balance for seaborne metallurgical coal. Meanwhile, the dramatic pullback in shares of Weatherford International (NYSE: WFT) and Schlumberger (NYSE: SLB) belies the fact that Brent crude oil remains above $100 per barrel and is up 25 to 30 percent year over year. (See Outlook for Oil Services Stocks./energy-strategist/articles/4317/the-outlook-for-oil-services-stocks)
3.    Consider some shorts and hedges. We recently booked /energy-strategist/articles/4622/raked-over-the-coals a sizable profit on half our short position in First Solar (NSDQ: FSLR). Investors seeking to go short should consider Diamond Offshore (NYSE: DO) and First Trust ISE Revere Natural Gas (NYSE: FCG).

Stock Talk

Add New Comments

You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account