Best Buys
I’m making a number of changes to the names in my Best Buys list.
1. SandRidge Mississippian Trust I (NYSE: SDT) is a US energy trust that I first profiled and added to the Growth Portfolio in the Oct. 6, 2011, issue of The Energy Strategist, The Yield Issue. Since joing the model Portfolio, the trust has already delivered a total return of almlost 50 percent–an impressive gain. Strong oil and liquids pricing should enabled the trust to continue to pay a distribution that exceeds the target levels laid out in its prospectus. Based on the trust’s most recent quarterly dividend, the units currently yield 9.7 percent. I expect the trust to disburse between $3.50 and $4 per unit in 2012, equivalent to a yield of between 10.5 and 12 percent.
SandRidge Mississippian Trust I remains a solid long-term bet, but the stock has traded well above my buy target in recent weeks. I am dropping Sandridge Mississippian Trust from my Best Buy List solely because the units appear overbought at these levels; however, the stock remains a buy under 30 in the Growth Portfolio.Investors sitting on a substantial gain from this position should consider taking some profits off the table and allocating the proceeds into the other high-yielding names in my Best Buy list.
2. Chesapeake Granite Wash Trust (NYSE: CHKR), which I profiled in Royalty Trusts: Buy and Sells, replaces Sandridge Mississippian Trust I on my Best Buys list and rates a buy under 25.Investors should also be on the lookout for the initial public offering of SandRidge Mississippian Trust II (NYSE: SDR) in early April. I analyzed this exciting prospect in the Jan. 25, 2011, issue of The Energy Strategist Weekly, Energy Investing: Eagerly Awaiting the IPO of SandRidge Mississippian Trust II.
3. I am also adding a new stock the Growth Portfolio and my Best Buys list: Mid-Con Energy Partners LP (NSDQ: MCEP). This upstream master limited partnership (MLP) owns about 9.9 million barrels of oil-equivalent reserves in Oklahoma, Kansas and Colorado. Crude oil accounts for 98 percent of these estimated reserves, a favorable asset base at a time when natural gas prices continue to hover near record lows.
Like most upstream MLPs, Mid-Con Energy Partners operates in established plays that feature limited drilling risk and predictable decline rates.
When the first well is drilled in an untapped field, pent-up geologic pressure forces the hydrocarbons into the well and to the surface of the earth, a process known as “primary” production. This reservoir pressure declines throughout the well’s life span, reducing the rate of production. More than 90 percent of Mid-Con Energy Partners’ wells have been in production since 1982 or earlier.
These mature wells still have value and can yield oil and gas for decades after their output peaks: Less than 20 percent to 30 percent of recoverable reserves are extracted during primary production.
Although mature wells won’t generate much production growth, these assets fit well within the MLP structure because of their predictable decline rates and low maintenance costs.
Mid-Con Energy Partners uses water flooding to enhance production from their wells. This secondary-production technique involves injecting water into the periphery of a field to restore reservoir pressure and push oil toward producing wells.
More than 90 percent of the MLP’s 272 producing wells employ water flooding to improve production rates. Six to 18 months of water injections are required to increase production, but the technique works: At the end of the third quarter of 2011, Mid-Con Energy Partners’ acreage yielded about 1,343 barrels of oil equivalent per day–up 100 percent on a year-over-year basis. Management attributes about 75 percent of this production growth to water flooding; acquisitions and basic maintenance work accounted for the remainder of these gains.
Mid-Con Energy Partners has two options for growing cash flow: ramping up production in its existing leasehold and making bolt-on acquisitions.
Operating in mature fields doesn’t constrain Mid-Con Energy Partners’ prospects for organic growth. Consider the MLP’s ongoing operations in the Highlands Field, an area that’s been in production since 1980 and has already yielded more than 3 million barrels of oil. The outfit began water flooding this play in October 2008, and production rates began to tick up in April 2009. Today, the field produces about 657 barrels of oil equivalent per day, up more than sevenfold from just 91 barrels of oil equivalent per day in January 2010.
At this point, Mid-Con Energy Partners has pumped enough water into the field to offset about 27 percent of the liquids extracted from the play since 1980. Output from this enhanced-recovery technique will peak once the MLP has injected an equivalent amount of water to previous production. Management estimates that the field’s gross output will exceed 1,500 barrels of oil equivalent per day once this occurs.
These water-flooding projects can extend a field’s productive life by more than a decade. Mid-Con Energy Partners began pumping water into the Southeast Hewitt Unit in June 1997, 18 years after the field was first discovered. Output from the field began to tick up in November 1997. Management estimates that the volume of water pumped into the field represents about 98 percent of extracted resources. Production from the field peaked in 2010–about 13 years after secondary production began.
Mid-Con Energy Partners also has ample opportunity to grow its output and cash flow through acquisitions. The MLP has formed two limited liability companies (LLC) with Yorktown Partners, a private-equity firm that focuses on energy-related assets and owns Mid-Con Energy Partners’ general partner. These LLCs will acquire properties where producers are already using water-flooding to enhance output and acreage that appears well-suited for this approach.
Mid-Con Energy Partners’ management team initiated almost one-quarter of all water-flooding projects in Oklahoma over the past six years, which inspires confidence in the firm’s ability to identify lucrative bolt-on acquisitions. In addition, Yorktown Partners, which has about $3 billion in assets under management, has already invested in a number of oil- and gas-producing properties that might be a good fit for Mid-Con Energy Partners.
By dropping down a new water-flooding project to Mid-Con Energy Partners, Yorktown Partners would be able to immediately monetize this asset and shield ongoing revenue from the field from corporate taxation. Meanwhile, rising production and cash flow from the dropped-down asset would enable Mid-Con Energy Partners to grow its distribution. With an almost 50 percent stake in Mid-Con Energy Partners’ outstanding units, Yorktown Partners has ample incentive to pursue strategies that will foster the MLP’s growth.
Hedges help to insulate the partnership from fluctuations in commodity prices. Management aims to hedge between 50 and 80 percent of total production over a rolling three- to five-year period. At present, the MLP has hedged about 53 percent of its 2012 production and 30 percent of 2013 production, locking in prices of about $100 per barrel.
Although Mid-Con Energy Partners’ hedge book isn’t as comprehensive as that of Growth Portfolio holding Linn Energy LLC (NSDQ: LINE), the MLP’s exposure to rising oil prices could bolster cash flow.
Mid-Con Energy Partners plans to pay a minimum quarterly distribution of $0.475 per unit, equivalent to a 12-month yield of approximately 9 percent. The MLP pays its general partner 2 percent of any distributable cash flow.
Management estimates that the MLP will generate enough cash flow to cover its full-year 2012 minimum distributions by a healthy 1.2 times. However, this projection assumes that the partnership will grow it production by roughly 80 percent and that crude oil prices will average about $96 per barrel. Based on the firm’s production history, these estimates don’t appear overly aggressive, though cash flow could take a hit if oil prices tumble.
Mid-Con Energy Partners has no exposure to depressed natural gas prices and unhedged exposure to oil prices, a positioning that works well in the current environment. At the same time, a correction in oil prices would weigh on the MLP’s cash flow. The units offer a higher-than-average yield to offset this risk. Mid-Con Energy Partners LP rates a buy under 24.
4. Pacific Drilling (NYSE: PACD), profiled in Going Deep, also joins the Higher-Risk segment of my Best Buys list.
5. Investors should also cover their short position in Diamond Offshore Drilling (NYSE: DO) for a loss of 6.3 percent. The company’s fleet of older rigs is disadvantaged in the current environment, leaving the stock with little room for upside. But the stock could enjoy a bump if day rates on deepwater drilling rigs ticks up. Investors should still avoid Diamond Offshore Drilling.
6. I am cutting recommendation Knightsbridge Tankers (NSDQ: VLCCF) to a hold and removing the stock from my Best Buys list. The company owns a fleet of oil tankers and dry-bulk carriers that transport iron ore, grains and other commodities.
The charter rates for both tankers and dry-bulk ships have weakened in recent quarters because of a persistent oversupply. The problem isn’t a lack of demand; rather, shipping firms ordered too many new ships during the 2004-07 boom years, and a glut of new ships is now entering the market.
Knightsbridge Tankers is insulated from the risk of near-term weakness in rates by its long-term charter contracts. These lease agreements signed should enable the ship owner to maintain its $0.50 quarterly dividend through at least the end of 2013. That’s equivalent to a yield of about 13.4 percent at current prices.
But the stock will tread water at best until sentiment toward the tanker industry improves. For that to happen, ship owners will need to scrap some of their fleet. We expect the tanker market to remain oversupplied until 2015. An investment in Knightsbridge Tankers will be dead money until that happens.
7. Finally, I’m adding GeoResources (NSDQ: GEOI), a small-cap name with exposure to the Bakken and Eagle Ford Shale to the Higher Risk segment of my Best Buys list.
Stock Talk
Add New Comments
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account