NXP Semi Zig Zags, Ford and GM Await NAFTA and more…
I always spend more time worrying about the positions that move against us than those that are working. Last week was a particularly rough week. Almost all of our options positions moved sharply against us.
Ford (NYSE: F) and General Motors (NYSE: GM) slipped as investors worried a NAFTA deal would be delayed even longer. Then NXP Semiconductors (NSDQ: NXPI), which I expected to jump on its Analysts’ Day, got clobbered by a Sell recommendation.
To add icing to the cake, The Chemours (NYSE: CC) slid on news that pricing for its most profitable product is due to fall.
Calgon, take me away.
Of course, there’s not much to do when a stock isn’t working as predicted but to gather as much information as possible and reassess. I’ve done just that and feel comfortable with our positions. I am most worried about The Chemours, which behaves incredibly badly even when the news is favorable.
You likely saw the new bearish trade I suggested today on Allergan (NYSE: AGN). The options only briefly traded below my buy limit price and likely before most of you received the alert. I suggest being patient for now.
I had the trade teed up for last week but foolishly waited until after the company hosted an event for analysts. The news of Teva receiving approval for a competing migraine drug was unexpected and is likely the reason for the heavy selling today. Let’s hope some sell-side bull steps up and gets the stock back up so we can execute these puts at a reasonable price.
Around the Portfolio:
AbbVie (NYSE: ABBV) announced FDA approval for a label expansion for its cancer drug VENCLEXTA. The drug can now be used in combination with rituximab to treat a larger patient population.
AGCO Corp. (NYSE: AGCO): The monthly government grain inventory and production report due mid-month may weigh on AGCO. Recent months showed increased soybean inventory levels as production outstripped demand due to tariffs.
I thought last week that the stock might drop on its presentation at Morgan Stanley on September 13. This was due to investors acknowledging the possibility that the company’s recent acquisition of Precision Planting might not be going according to plan. In reviewing prior transcripts I found this gem from CFO Andrew Beck:
Andrew H. Beck, AGCO Corporation – Senior VP & CFO [14]
“Well, we — you were focused on organic growth, but we had a large acquisition, impactful acquisition, Precision Planting that’s helping our North America results a lot here in the first 3 quarters of the year. And then in the fourth quarter, we won’t get that favorable comp anymore because we got their business for Q4 last year. So that comes out of the numbers. And then also as we commented many times, we are still working our dealer inventories down in North America, and we expect some of that impact to be more second half of the year where we’re moving the dealer inventories down and our retails will be higher than our wholesales in the second half.”
This language indicates to me that the purchased business has too much inventory in the channel. Investors have not been able to compare growth rates for the acquired business yet but can do so once they loop around the purchase date.
The stock did indeed drop a hair but not due to any discussion regarding the acquisition. I reviewed the transcript in which the company was only asked “softball” questions. However, CFO Andrew Beck did admit that dealer inventories are higher than desirable.
The Chemours Company continues to get slammed. This time it was due to an industry report warning that prices for TiO2, one of CC’s fastest-growing products, may fall. The report focuses on generic commodity-like versions of this chemical. The note specifically mentions that many Chinese competitors are trying to improve the quality of their product to avoid the lower prices.
Based on my research, CC’s product is at the high end of quality and pricing. Management recently noted that they did not see any excess supply of similar product hitting the market. The following comments are from the company’s August presentation at a Jefferies conference:
“Yes, so coming back to our TiO2 business. First of all, we love all of our businesses and we just are blessed with a great portfolio of very profitable businesses. TiO2, as you know, in our last quarter was a 34% EBITDA margin business. It’s a great business and throws off a ton of free cash flow. Sitting here today, we really like the structure of the markets in which we participate. There is good global growth as we sit here today. And there is no really significant new supply that we can see coming to market in the foreseeable future. And certainly, no meaningful supply in the segments and the quality spectrum in which we participate in the markets.”
Obviously, the market is not paying very much attention to these comments but I continue to believe the company is well positioned. Yet I am not oblivious to the stock move and deciding on how to handle the $49 calls which expire in October.
General Motors, where we own calls, may trade higher due to positive comments from RBC analyst Joseph Spak. Spak noted the valuation reflects ‘low expectations’, adding that while investors are focused on China and the direction of earnings in FY19, he believes that the market expectations are already “very low” with a forward valuation multiple ex-Cruise and ex-cash at just over 3.5-times earnings. He kept his Outperform rating and $49 price target on the stock after meeting with management.
NXP Semiconductors zig-zagged last week. It dropped precipitously after its September 11 Analysts’ Day. The stock was downgraded to a Sell by Stifel after the meeting.
The Stifel analyst noted a fear that the company would take on too much debt in the process of buying back stock. I don’t have access to the details of his report, but NXPI reduced its debt by $3.9 billion since the start of 2017. It will receive $2 billion in a breakup fee from Qualcomm. Part of that fee is used for buybacks and part will be funded by cash from operations and perhaps some debt.
I am confused by the analyst’s draconian downgrade as the company’s target leverage ratio (the amount of debt versus cash being generated) is 1.6x, a pretty low level.
Then the stock was then upgraded to Buy from Neutral at BofA/Merrill Lynch and had its target raised from $111 to $114 at Cowen. I expect the stock to jolt around a bit as its investor base transitions to new holders excited about the company’s prospects in the autonomous driving market.
Stock Talk
Chris Stubbs
Chemours Company option trade is a disaster. Currently down 98%. With time running out it has nowhere to go. The share price keeps hitting new lows regardless of +ve news flow.
I guess you cant win them all…………………
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk
Linda McDonough
Chris,
Yes, the disastrous nature of the CC trade is not lost on me. This is the most difficult situation, selling the option will net pennies so the risk/reward of holding the option until expiration is leaning towards holding it.
I am trying to exit options positions if they are down 25% and roll them forward but as you know, options pricing moves so quickly, the drop typically comes overnight and in bigger steps. I am continually trying to improve my hit rate and strategy with these options but as you note, you can’t win them all.
That said, I don’t take these losses lightly and am working on ways to limit the size of the losses.
Best,
Linda
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk
Bill D
Linda, regarding NXPI, your thoughts are the stock will recover from it’s current $92 price range and has time to hit 100 by 10/19? I opened NXP, F and GM option positions to expand my use of all services beyond OFI and VT. I closed F today per your Sell recommendation; GM is in an OK position to hold but NXPI is concerning. I know all can’t be winners, but hoped for a little better start with the service . . .
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk
Linda McDonough
Bill,
I do expect NXPI to rebound towards the $100 price. We don’t have to have the stock hit that price to have a profit on the calls, but I do think it will work towards that level.
I agree this has been a particularly tough juncture for me with the market. I was relieved to read recent data that cheaper stocks have been lagging their momentum, money-losing peers. I tend to sway more conservatively with my stock picks so there will be times when I lag the market or have options picks that do not work immediately or even sometimes not pan out at all.
Take some time to review my portfolio record under the closed tabs. I’m quite proud of the record and have had some really great successes with many of our options trades and I hope to return to that trend soon.
Best,
Linda
RJ
Will you give us exit or roll instructions if NXPI does not hit the $100 strike by the 19th of Oct?
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk
Matt H
When the NXPI stock dipped I doubled down on your recommendation of the 100 calls but I was able to get 90 calls.. already enough profit on that one that the 100s are pure profit. Thanks!
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk
Linda McDonough
Happy that worked out for you Matt- well done.
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk
Debbie Pruett
I don’t know what to do with GM or NXPI. I purchased because of your recommendation. Now both of the stocks and really bad. They expire soon. What are we suppose to do? I don’t want to loose what I have spent. So far your recommendation have not panned out or I made $5 after commissions. To me this is not Profitable. To you expect your followers to be seasoned traders. Expecting them to know how to make your trades. I’m sure there are others besides myself that is new to this and has no clue how to make your trades. When I call TD Ameritrade and tell them what you have in your news letter they don’t understand either.
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk
Linda McDonough
Debbie,
I cannot emphasize enough how risky options trading is. I completely understand how frustrating it is to see these both under water so badly but this is simply how they work sometimes. Both situations I expected (auto stocks to trade up on a NAFTA resolution and NXPI trading up on its analysts day) did not happen. At that point, the options were already down quite a bit. As I noted I missed the opportunity to issue a sell alert on the GM options last week.
There is simply no magic bullet in options trading and no trader or analyst who is correct all the time. I am doing my very best to offer well-researched, timely trade ideas but am sometimes wrong. My complete record on stock and options trade suggestions is available on the website. This has been a particularly volatile time for the stocks I have suggested, which doesn’t lessen your pain but I do note it has been an unusually difficult period for my trade ideas.
The options do have a few weeks until expiration. There is the possibility they expire worthless, a chance with every single option purchased. However, I am watching them closely and looking for the best exit.
Best,
Linda
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk
Stanley
Hi Linda,
I really don’t like writing this email, This has been smoldering with me for many days.
I know trading options is a tricky way to trade, We ARE dependent on you to help us trade and to protect us if stocks ( options) go in the wrong direction.
That is why it is called Wealth Management.
In your report you state NXPI had disappointing earnings, that was the time to bail out.
The odds That NXPI would hit 100 in such a small time frame were very small. We should have received a sell alert days ago.
NXPI maybe be a great company in the long run, we are not trading for the long haul with short term options.
Conservation of capital is part of the trading process.
Loosing half an investment is a far cry from loosing the entire investment.
I am not sure you grasp that concept,. In the months I am following you this hasn’t occurred once.
Mr Pearce and Mr Leeb have both traded us out of positions with a loss and I thanked them. Preservation of Capital.
Same thing with CC you should have given us a sell recommendation weeks ago.
I kept reading your veiled optimism and I stuck with you instead of following my own instincts. I read your reply to Chris where you stated at 25% you thought about getting us out but you didn’t. I followed CC on a very regular basis there was plenty of opportunity to exit CC. My mistake was not following my instincts.
Same thing earlier in the year with the shippers. Three bad trades.
I don’t buy every bad recommendation that you have given us. I have made a small profit here and there.
The majority have have been pretty bad.
What irks me the most your don’t protect us if things aren’t great. No one can be 100%
correct in this market, no one.
It is what you do when things aren’t flowing in your way that separates good needed advice.
Take a few minutes and study Jim Pearce and Jim Fink, they are marvelous at their job.
They never quit,
I think you know what I am referring to.
I wish you better in the future.
Thanks,
Stan
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk
Add New Comments
You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk